During Tuesday’s class, we shared our research findings with our groups. After reading my story, I found it very helpful for the group to read my work and fill out the feedback page. Getting feedback made the process of revising my second draft a lot easier. Also hearing my other group members share their work was interesting to hear their perspective on the gratitude process.
This same day while it was fresh in my mind, I decided to start revising my first draft. Following the feedback page requirements helped me change and rewrite some of the sections in my paper. I particularly focused on my findings section along with my conclusion. I felt as if they needed the most work. For the findings section, I focused on answering the research question. I included a journal entry to help prove that using PERMA allowed me to evaluate my journal entries and become more grateful which improved my well-being. I also added expert opinion to help prove my point which I didn’t have in the first draft. In the conclusion section, I added if I was going to continue with the “three good things” gratitude process and why. I also connected my introduction short story into the conclusion and why the story is relevant. Overall, I think listening to others papers helped me think more in depth about my paper and what I am missing or what I did well. Following the feedback guidelines page helped me apply what I am missing in the findings and conclusion sections.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Taylor DannakerI will use this blog to write about moments in my life where I hope you can understand me a little more. Archives
December 2018
Categories
All
|